Table of Contents
If you shoot someone what will be the penalties that you will face
In India, even if the act is done with intention to harm or murder someone, firing at him is an uncompromisable criminal offense under the law. It involves sundry legal measures that prescribe a hefty penalty. IPC and Arms Act describe such actions and provide maximum punishment for such individuals. This article categorizes the legal implications of firing at somebody in India along with some case laws which explains the extent of the laws in India towards this aspect.
Legal Framework Governing Firearm Offenses in India
India has very strict and strict policies in as far as possession of firearms in the country is concerned. The primary laws governing firearm-related offenses are:
- Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860: In particular, Section 307 deals with the attempt to murder somebody by firing at him. Section 300 is about murder and Section 304A is related with death caused by negligence.
- Arms Act, 1959: This law governs the possession, purchase and utilization of firearms and ammunition. Carrying or using firearms without the license or whose license has been withdrawn is regarded unlawful and triggers severe consequences.
It is now necessary to consider legal ramifications of shooting at a person depending on whether the attempt led to an injury or a death.
Punishment for Attempt to Murder (Section 307 of IPC)
If any person attempt to kill another with a fire-arm but fail in the attempt to do so the offender is charged under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code. It says any act which is intended to cause the death of another is an offense, even if the attempted murder was not accomplished. The punishment for attempt to murder includes:
- Imprisonment: Up to 10 years or life imprisonment, depending on the severity of the attack.
- Fine: The court may also impose a fine in addition to imprisonment.
Example Case:
The same year, a businessman from Surat was fired upon by his competitor who wanted to take over his property. The victim reached alive from the incidence. The attacker was charged under sec 307 and was awarded a rigorous imprisonment for 7 years. This case attracted so much attention and it is a clear illustration on how Indian courts handle attempted murder.
Punishment for Murder (Section 302 of IPC)
If by the firing the victim dies then the shooter is tried for murder under section 302 of the IPC. The penalties under Section 302 are:
- Death Penalty: Indeed, it can be said that the above mentioned provision should be applied only in rarest of the rare cases where the court finds that the murder was committed after prior thinking/premeditated, or it is a case of heinous murders.
- Life Imprisonment: In case a certain case is not qualified to be dealt with under the “rarest of rare” provision, the normal mode is to sentence one to life imprisonment.
Example Case:
The last such incident was reported in 2018 where a politician was shot dead in a public place in Uttar Pradesh. The perpetrator was arrested, charged with Section 302, and consequently, gave him a jail term for life. This conviction was marked by the court highlighting the importance of not using firearms to work out issues.
Punishment for Illegal Possession of Firearms (Arms Act, 1959)
If the person firing the gun holder of the firearm does not possess a legal license for the gun then other charges under Arms Act, 1959 applies. The penalties include:
- Imprisonment: Up to 7 years for possession or use of firearm without a licence.
- Fine: It also gives the power to impose a comparatively large fine.
This law makes certain that firearms never get into the wrong hand and that even possessing a gun without permission of the law is a major offence. If someone fires a gun ILLEGALLY, this act will be charged severally resulting to multiple charges that lead to a heavy punishment.
Example Case:
In this paper, a 2020 Bihar case of a man who fired a gun at a family member due to a domestic altercations was said to have been using an unlawful firearm. Apart from the Section 307 charge, which alleged an attempt to commit murder, he was also charged under the Arms Act and got an additional years five years for possessing an arsenal illegally.
Impact of Self-Defense Claims
Sometimes, the shooter will be able to justify the shooting by claiming that he or she was acting in defense of his or her life. The right to self defence is however provided under section 100 of the IPC but comes with some form of restrictions. The court considers the extent to which force has been applied relevant to the threat incurred. If the firing was excessive or may not have been necessary, the self defence claim may be tossed out which means full prosecution under the sections of IPC, as mentioned above.
The Role of Intent in Determining Punishment
Another consideration which determines the ruling of the case is the purpose of the person who fired the gun. And it is truly said ‘If it was intended to harm or kill’ then the punishment is severe.On the other hand, if the firing was accidental or negligent (without intent to harm), the accused could face lesser charges under Section 304A of IPC, which deals with causing death by negligence.
Example Case:
An interesting case in India was the one that occurred in Delhi in 2017 where at a wedding, with an accidental discharge of the weapon, a guest was killed. While he could not have planned to cause the man’s death, he was arrested for culpable homicide not amounting to murder and received 5 years under Section 304A, not to mention a hefty fine.
Conclusion
Shooting at someone in India is highly punishable by law no matter the fate of the person who was shot. Control measures in India are vested in the Indian Penal Code and the Arms Act and punish offenders with sam as life imprisonment and the death penalty as appropriate. Equally if not more so, the illegality of carrying firearms adds on to the penalty.Additionally, the illegal possession of firearms further compounds the punishment. Courts also consider self-defense claims, but they require strong justification and evidence.
In a society where firearms can be misused, these stringent legal measures act as a deterrent, helping to curb gun-related violence and ensure justice for the victims.
Such knowledge of the legal consequences will enable the citizens to appreciate the ramifications of making the actions and or taking a legislation by adherence to the law.
