Navigating Justice: CJI DY Chandrachud’s Transformative First Year at the Supreme Court
In the ever-evolving landscape of Indian judiciary, Chief Justice of India (CJI) DY Chandrachud’s first year at the helm of the Supreme Court stands out as a transformative period. As the 50th CJI, his tenure has been marked by significant judgments, a nuanced relationship with the Central government, and a series of reforms aimed at modernizing India’s apex court.
The CJI and the Central Government: A Balancing Act
Justice Chandrachud’s term has intersected with some of the most pivotal cases in recent history – Aadhaar, Ram Janmabhoomi, and Demonetisation, to name a few. His approach has been closely watched, particularly in the context of the Supreme Court’s independence. The CJI’s rulings and observations have, at times, challenged the Central government, most notably in the same-sex marriage case where he underscored the individual right to adopt irrespective of marital status, pushing back against the Central government’s stance.
Challenging the Status Quo: Judicial Observations and Appointments
The CJI’s strong stance on transparency is evident in his criticism of sealed cover submissions – a practice that has been under scrutiny. By advocating for openness, CJI Chandrachud has ensured that the judiciary’s decisions are made in the light of day, reinforcing public trust in the institution.
On the front of judicial appointments, the Collegium, under CJI Chandrachud’s leadership, has been more vocal about its disagreements with the government’s rejections. This has brought a new level of accountability to the appointment process, which has traditionally been opaque.
Reforming the Judiciary: A Tech-Savvy Approach
One of the most laudable achievements of CJI Chandrachud has been the integration of technology into the judiciary. The digitization of courtrooms and the e-filing system have not only streamlined procedures but also made justice more accessible to the public.
Responding to Criticism: Upholding Judicial Independence
CJI Chandrachud has not shied away from responding to criticisms from political figures, asserting the judiciary’s independence and its vital role in upholding personal liberties. His proactive stance has been a testament to a judiciary that listens and adapts.
The Path Ahead: Pending Cases and Diversity
Despite these advances, challenges such as the high number of pending cases and the need for greater diversity within the judiciary remain. However, there has been a notable drop in pendency under CJI Chandrachud’s tenure, and with his commitment to inclusivity, there is hope for a judiciary that reflects the nation it serves.
