The legal debates surrounding Aligarh Muslim University (AMU) asking for the status of a minority have been a regular subject of judicial scrutiny in India. Established in the late 19th century and designated as a minority institution, AMU’s implications for educational rights
The Supreme Court of Canada's decision in United States v. Burns established that extraditing individuals to countries where they could face the death penalty violates section 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. This ruling underscores the importance of aligning
The R. v. Marshall case was a pivotal moment in Canadian jurisprudence, highlighting the need to honor historic Indigenous-Crown treaties. It addressed the complexities of Indigenous treaty rights, particularly in the context of fishing, and sparked significant controversy and debate.
The R. v. Stinchcombe case, a pivotal Supreme Court of Canada decision, established the necessity of full and complete disclosure of evidence by the Crown in criminal cases. This decision, rooted in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, has significantly influenced
The Arnab Goswami vs State of Maharashtra case transcends the specifics of legal statutes to touch upon the inherent rights granted by the Constitution. It is a narrative of justice, individual rights, and the unwavering power of truth within the Indian judiciary.
The Supreme Court of Canada's ruling in Eldridge v. British Columbia established a precedent for the rights of persons with disabilities, affirming the need for sign language interpreters in provincial hospitals and expanding the application of the Charter to government-funded programs.
The Supreme Court of Canada's advisory opinion in Reference re: Same-Sex Marriage [2004] was a pivotal moment in Canadian legal history, affirming the constitutional validity of same-sex marriage and reinforcing the federal government's jurisdiction over marriage laws
Charkaoui v. Canada marked a critical point in Canadian legal history, scrutinizing the constitutionality of security certificate procedures. This case emphasized the importance of upholding individual liberties and habeas corpus rights under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms in national security
Delgamuukw v. British Columbia is a landmark Supreme Court of Canada decision that significantly advanced the recognition of Aboriginal title and rights. It underscored the importance of accommodating oral histories in legal proceedings and set precedents for negotiating Aboriginal land claims.
The Supreme Court of Canada's ruling in Chaoulli v. Quebec (Attorney General) [2005] marked a critical juncture in the debate over healthcare rights in Canada, challenging the existing norms of public and private healthcare provision
Little Sisters Book and Art Emporium v. Canada is a critical Supreme Court decision balancing freedom of expression with regulatory powers. It underscores the complexities of censorship and the importance of non-discriminatory application of laws, especially in matters of importation and classification